Un-Disguised Discrimination: A Critique of Poland’s Refugee Policy vis-à-vis the Belarus Border Crisis - II

By Aditya Maheshwari, a third year law student at NLSIU, Bangalore.

---

Recommended Socio-Legal Solutions to the Belarus Border Crisis

Firstly, it is suggested that Poland should strive to resolve the crisis through meaningful diplomacy with Belarus (tackle the root cause of the crisis). The same was somewhat fruitful in thawing border tensions when Angela Merkel mediated and is essentially de-escalatory for both countries and the refugees pawned between them. Suffocating economic sanctions on Belarus should only be a last resort as such measures could again pave the way for Belarusian retaliation and another humanitarian catastrophe. Contemporaneously, Poland should uphold its Convention obligations by allowing the Middle Eastern refugees into the country and examining their applications neutrally and individually. In furtherance of Alia Rebiah’s suggestions, UNHCR can be requested to label this crisis as that of particular concern. Thereafter, it can increase its intervention to cooperate more with the Polish government while maintaining neutrality and adherence to international standards. It can provide technical support to authorities, offer training for border officials and conduct direct monitoring of asylum procedures. It can also ensure safeguards for vulnerable groups and assist in processing individual claims. Thus, if the Polish administration displays enough political will to revere UNHCR assistance, it can protect its actual security interests through nuanced identifications of credible claims from the otherwise.

Thereafter, ideally the genuine asylum seekers should be granted official refugee status and if feasible later on, they should be allowed to naturalise into Polish society. The same would also be in line with a landmark judgement envisioning a more open citizenship regime for Poland. On a more realistic note however, the current right wing government would certainly not budge this much due to overarching political considerations. Thus, it should at least follow a middle ground approach and grant temporary protection or even humanitarian status/tolerated stay to Muslim refugees under relevant ambits of the 2003 and 2013 laws on foreigners. Any bare minimum permit would be better than leaving them at the mercy of exploitative Russians, Belarusians or conflict-ravaged origin states. A temporary protection regime for Middle Easterners is also grounded in political pragmatism as it could offer a good option for Polish authorities to promote more social openness and tackle Islamophobia without paying too high of a price at the ballot box.

Thus, secondly, Poland should encourage local integration of Muslim refugees alongside the Ukrainians. It is opined that if implemented meticulously- the benefits of this measure to Polish economy, demography and overall society would outweigh its simultaneous downsides. Per Alia Rebiah, Ukrainian refugees have contributed an estimated 2.7%  to Poland’s GDP in 2024 alone. They have revitalised local economies, filled critical labour shortages, driven employment rates up and even started businesses. Demographically, they have offset urban population decline. Challenges do include housing shortages, strain on education and health systems and eventual refugee fatigue but the impact is optimistic overall- both economically and socially.

Even though Poles have had little cultural contact with Muslims, historical interactions between the two communities have been generally positive and thus the present dislike towards Muslims seems unjustified and irrational. Therefore, there is no just reason why Muslim refugees too cannot take up jobs which aging societies such as Poland struggle to fill. As Alia Rebiah opined, UNHCR can again step in and expand support for language learning, credential recognition and vocational training while working with employers and NGOs to match refugees and skilled jobs. Best practices from Germany and Sweden such as mentorship programmes and structured integration pathways can be best adapted to Poland as well. In fact, a new study has found that Muslims actually assimilate well in Germany even though a lot of Germans do not like them. These reports directly debunk the Polish Law and Order party’s vitriolic narrative about the impossibility of Muslim adaptation and the community being a threat to economic security as mere beneficiaries of social welfare.

Also, refugee children can especially secure Poland’s future through the right integration opportunities such as education. More than 50,000 refugee children (a lot of them being Ukrainians) have already been enrolled in Polish schools. Per Alia Rebiah, guaranteeing equal access to education and healthcare, providing bilingual support in schools, providing inter-cultural training for teachers, guardianship, psychosocial programmes, etc, can prove crucial in nurturing the social adaptation of Muslim kids. An already burdened school system should not deprive Muslim refugee kids of their education, which would hurt their best interests as enshrined in the 1969 Child Rights Convention. Alia Rebiah argues that community grants, recognition of volunteer efforts and the mobilisation of EU and private funding for teacher training and school infrastructure would prove essential in managing this problem. Furthermore, awareness campaigns should highlight refugees’ and refugee children’s contributions to Polish society to reduce perceptions of burden against both Ukrainian and Muslim kids.

However, it is opined that Poland should have the right to ensure that certain Middle Eastern migrants such as the economic ones without genuine asylum needs do not exploit prospective relaxations in Polish policy and set a precedent for large scale influx. Through the same, Poland can maintain its core demographic identity without othering Muslims in actual need of protection. Moreover, it is contended that the nation should safeguard Muslim refugees’ reasonable rights to religious freedom under Article 4 of the Convention with the aim of averting further conflict and Islamophobia. It should not implement blanket hijab/burqa bans to emulate other EU states and excessively preserve cultural homogeneity. Refugees’ rights are not contingent on them forgoing their identities and cultures because integration allows for cultural differences along with equal, peaceful and symbiotic coexistence. Invocations of being democratically elected on promises of anti-immigration policies also cannot salvage the Polish government from its overarching international obligations, notably when the interests of its own populace are being accounted for. Overall, it is urged that Poland expand its integration plans and adopt new legislations in this specific Muslim refugee integration context. It could also pass pertinent amendments to the Aliens Act- all in furtherance of Article 34 of the Convention, which talks about efficient naturalisation and assimilation.

Thirdly, even if local integration cannot garner Polish socio-political will or if a protracted refugee situation begins overwhelming public resources, the country can still abide by Article 31 of the Convention, which addresses the resettlement solution. The same has been in force in Polish law itself since 2012. Since 2015, EU resettlement schemes have helped more than 130,000 vulnerable people in finding protection. In 2015-17, an emergency intra-EU relocation transferred around 35,000 asylum seekers from Italy and Greece to other member states. Another such measure could be contextualised for Poland as well. Through EU coordination, Poland could enter into resettlement agreements with welcoming EU states who are not too embroiled in managing a debilitating Ukrainian refugee situation. Moreover, Poland being an EU member, retains the right to return applicants to a safe third country outside EU territory. Based on the same, the EU has increasingly sought to deflect its protection obligations to Turkey by making use of its external relations policy and funding. Resettlement to EU countries is also an important element of the EU-Turkey Statement. In the present Polish context however, a certain number of Muslim refugees could also be resettled from EU borders to Turkey. This is because resettlement countries have offered places to specific groups arising from certain emergencies, often when there is proximity of identity between the refugees and inhabitants of the resettling State. For Muslim refugees from the Poland-Belarus border emergency, locally integrating into a solidarity displaying, Muslim-majority Turkey would surely be more seamless. Per Alia Rebiah too, resettlement remains a vital durable solution for refugees who cannot integrate locally. UNHCR and the Polish government can at least identify the highly vulnerable cases such as children or survivors of violence and coordinate with Turkey or other third countries willing to offer protection. Resettlement, relocation, humanitarian admissions, etc, have ultimately been described as one of the most effective ways to grapple with tough refugee crises.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this article has vehemently advocated for Polish refugee policies to be made equalitarian and non-partisan. Literature review of migration statistics, analogies with the Ukrainian crisis and pertinent human rights and international refugee law perspectives have extensively shaped this article’s humanitarian discourse. The immediate way forward for Poland, EU and the international community should be to resolve the Belarus border fiasco through a refugee-centric approach but without ignorance to the host country, Poland’s overall stability. For Poland itself, robust legal overhauls are much-needed but more than that, the country needs a deeper socio-political introspection towards ending its anti-Muslim refugee sentiment. The nation’s current limbo warrants external cooperation such as increased UNHCR and EU assistance as well as domestic civil society and grassroots-level intervention. Polish society needs to understand that expendable and racialised exclusion aids no one and makes the country itself lose out on multiculturalism and its allied social benefits. As a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention, Poland should implement its values in testing times such as the crisis with Belarus. Overall, a turnaround in the current Polish approach would undoubtedly set an optimistic precedent for the protection of refugees and their children around an increasingly refugee fatigued and polarised world.